Thursday, July 3, 2008

live in relationships...

whats ur stand on this...?

4 comments:

Shubham Jain said...

I find “live in” relationships are formed for convenience. A partner can walk out any time, if he or she finds a new flame or a new agenda. As long as both the partners are happy with this arrangement they should get into the “Live In” relationship. This way, there is a minimum amount of heart ache. Again, it also depends on how long a person is into a Live In relationship? May be a year or so to get to know each other is understandable but if they go on like that for many years, they are sure to lose a spark one day. If you have met your soul mate then it is better to get married than to stay in “Live-in” forever.

Drupad Shastri said...

ain't it that if the relationship fails then u can't move on n it gets a bit more complicated...?? and won;t it make u more insecure then...?

Anonymous said...

It completly depends on how one feels good.
For me it is acceptable.
relationships failing.... getting complicated... etc etc .. yeah that do happen, but they also happen with married couples,.. dont they? Its quite natural :P ..ok ok... but i belive we are responsible for everything that happens to us.

candle stick said...

@shubham.....u epitomize d cncpt of live-in.....evry relationship has lot many facets n u saying dat walkin off it is easy is totally unacceptable unless d prsn walkin off is a hardcore cannabil who can eat up his feelings....one thng dat is generally nt d epicentre of talk is d emotional security of d women involvd..wat if she gets pregnant n his currrent flame leaves her.....da cncpt needs a fair revision as far as d feministic aspect is cncrnd...also 2 take into consideration is d maharashtra's high court ruling wich gives d gurl n equal status as dat of a wife.....wich is a debatable issue as it questions d sanctity n need of marriage....meads talks aba d concept of self....n dis relationship is in sum or d othr sense....celebration of self.....